1. Purpose

This policy establishes the requirements for cancellation, refunds, failed transactions, duplicate transactions, pending transactions and payment disputes for transactions initiated through Aatman and processed through the AurusPaytech payment platform. It defines responsibilities between Aatman, AurusPaytech, merchants/service providers, banks, payment networks and customers, and establishes controlled timelines, approvals, reconciliation and audit trails.

2. Scope

This policy applies to payment transactions facilitated through Aatman where AurusPaytech provides payment processing, payment aggregation/payment gateway or related payment technology services. It covers card, UPI, net banking and other payment methods supported by the applicable payment integration, subject to the rules of the relevant payment network, bank, issuer/acquirer and applicable law.

3. Roles and Responsibilities

Party Primary Responsibility Key Controls
Merchant-facing business (Aatman) Owns merchant relationship terms, customer-facing product/service cancellation policies, and commercial refund determinations (unless contractually reassigned).
  • Terms & Conditions publication
  • Refund eligibility validation
  • Refund approval & initiation
  • Audit trail & evidence retention
  • Direct customer communications
Payment Aggregator (PA) (AurusPaytech) Processes authorized refund instructions, transaction status checks, reversals and payment dispute/chargeback workflows within its role.
  • Transaction validation
  • Idempotency/duplicate controls
  • Refund processing
  • Status monitoring and webhook alerts
  • Daily reconciliation and settlement processing
  • Audit logs and escalation
Acquirer / Bank / Network
(Acquirer / Issuer Bank / NPCI / Card Networks)
Executes or facilitates settlement, reversal/refund and dispute processes according to applicable network/bank rules. Interbank Settlement, refund posting, chargeback/dispute processing and status responses.
Consumer Application Provider
(TPAP / PSP App)
Provides consumer-facing payment interfaces (e.g., UPI TPAP apps) to scan QR codes, initiate authorization flows, and display transaction results.
  • Payer authentication & security compliance
  • Payment initiation & token routing
  • In-app status & receipt rendering
  • In-app dispute logging & status reporting
End User
(Customer / Payer)
Originates genuine payment instructions, provides accurate transaction metadata, and files disputes or claims through authorized bank/app channels.
  • Valid transaction identifiers (RRN/Txn ID)
  • Transaction metadata (timestamp, amount, mode)
  • Timely dispute submission & proof provision

4. Refund Eligibility

A refund may be initiated where:

  • the customer has cancelled a service/order within the cancellation terms published by Aatman;
  • the merchant/service provider has approved a full or partial refund;
  • the transaction was processed incorrectly, duplicated or otherwise requires a commercial correction;
  • the service/order could not be fulfilled and the applicable terms provide for a refund;
  • a payment was captured but the underlying transaction could not be completed, subject to the applicable failed-transaction/reversal rules;
  • the refund is required by applicable law, regulatory direction, payment-network rules or an authorized dispute outcome.

Refund eligibility does not override applicable fraud, AML, sanctions, regulatory, contractual or payment-network controls.

5. Refund Request Process

  1. Customer submits the request through Aatman’s designated customer-support/refund channel or other approved channel.
  2. Aatman validates the order/service, cancellation terms, payment reference, amount and reason for refund.
  3. For eligible requests, Aatman records approval and submits the refund instruction through the approved AurusPaytech interface/process.
  4. AurusPaytech validates the original transaction, refund eligibility at platform level, available transaction status and duplicate-refund controls before processing.
  5. The refund is submitted to the relevant acquiring/payment channel and the refund reference/status is recorded.
  6. Reconciliation teams match the refund against the original transaction and settlement records.
  7. Customer receives confirmation when the refund has been successfully initiated/processed, with the expected crediting timeline where available.

6. Cancellation Conditions

Cancellation shall be governed primarily by Aatman’s published commercial/service terms. Aatman may permit cancellation before service fulfillment, subject to the applicable service-specific conditions. After fulfillment or where cancellation is restricted by the applicable terms, a refund may be declined unless required by law, contract, regulatory/payment-network rules or an approved exception.

AurusPaytech does not independently determine Aatman’s commercial cancellation policy unless expressly agreed in the applicable contract.

7. Refund Processing Timelines

Unless a shorter contractual or regulatory timeline applies, Aatman should acknowledge a valid refund request within 2 business days and process an approved refund instruction without undue delay. The time taken for the amount to appear in the customer’s account may depend on the issuer bank, acquirer, card network, UPI/banking channel or other payment method.

For failed transactions covered by RBI’s prescribed TAT framework, the applicable RBI auto-reversal and compensation requirements shall be followed. The prescribed TAT is an outer limit and applicable compensation for delay shall be handled as required by RBI rules.

Where the payment method/network imposes a specific refund window or operational requirement, the applicable network/bank rule shall be followed.

8. Failed Transactions

A failed transaction is one that is not fully completed due to circumstances such as communication failure, timeout or other causes not attributable to the customer, subject to the applicable RBI/payment-system definition.

  • Transaction status shall be determined using the authoritative payment/acquirer/bank response and reconciliation records.
  • No second debit/refund instruction shall be initiated solely because the customer reports a failure where the original transaction status is unresolved.
  • Where the customer account has been debited but the transaction has not completed, the transaction shall be monitored for automatic reversal/credit in accordance with applicable RBI and payment-system TAT requirements.
  • Where manual intervention is required, the case shall be escalated to the responsible operations/payment partner team and tracked to closure.
  • Applicable customer compensation for delayed reversal shall be provided in accordance with the prevailing RBI framework where AurusPaytech/Aatman has an obligation to do so.

9. Duplicate Transactions

Duplicate transactions include two or more successful debits for the same order/service where only one payment was intended, or duplicate payment instructions caused by retry, timeout or integration behaviour.

  • Aatman shall verify the order/reference and identify the valid transaction.
  • AurusPaytech shall use transaction IDs, order IDs, idempotency controls and gateway/acquirer records to determine whether a duplicate exists.
  • Where a duplicate successful debit is confirmed, the excess amount shall be refunded/reversed through the approved process, subject to applicable payment-channel rules.
  • Duplicate-refund prevention controls shall ensure that the same transaction is not refunded more than once.

All duplicate cases shall be recorded for reconciliation and recurring root-cause analysis.

10. Pending Transactions

A transaction shall be treated as pending when the final success/failure outcome is not yet confirmed by the relevant payment channel.

  • Pending transactions shall not be treated as successful solely based on a customer-side debit message.
  • Neither Aatman nor AurusPaytech shall initiate a duplicate payment/refund while the original transaction remains unresolved, unless the applicable operational procedure explicitly permits it.
  • Status shall be rechecked through the appropriate gateway/acquirer/bank/network mechanism.
  • If the transaction ultimately fails and the customer was debited, reversal shall be handled in accordance with the applicable RBI/payment-system TAT.
  • If the transaction succeeds, normal order/service fulfilment and refund rules shall apply.

11. Partial and Full Refunds

Full refunds return the complete eligible transaction amount. Partial refunds return only the approved portion of the transaction. Partial refunds shall be permitted only where supported by the applicable payment channel and Aatman’s commercial terms.

  • Each refund must reference the original transaction.
  • The cumulative value of all refunds shall not exceed the eligible original transaction amount.
  • Where multiple partial refunds are permitted, the system/process shall maintain cumulative refund tracking.
  • Any applicable fees, taxes or non-refundable charges shall be handled according to Aatman’s published terms and applicable law.

12. Payment Gateway / Platform-Related Refund Conditions

  • Refunds shall normally be routed to the original payment instrument/account used for the transaction, subject to applicable law, payment-network rules and approved exceptions.
  • Refunds shall not be processed to an unrelated account or instrument merely on customer request unless permitted under the applicable payment rules and approved by authorized personnel.
  • Refund requests shall contain sufficient transaction identifiers to prevent misapplication.
  • Gateway/acquirer downtime, API failure, timeout or status ambiguity shall be handled through the documented transaction-status and reconciliation process.
  • Where a refund cannot be processed because the original transaction is not eligible or the payment channel rejects the request, the case shall be escalated and the customer/merchant shall be informed of the status and next step.

Refund API credentials, keys, authentication data and payment information shall be protected in accordance with AurusPaytech security controls and applicable PCI DSS requirements.

13. Disputes and Chargebacks

Payment disputes and chargebacks shall be managed through the applicable acquiring bank, payment network and AurusPaytech dispute process. A chargeback is distinct from a voluntary merchant refund and shall not be treated as a normal refund request.

  • Disputes shall be logged with the applicable reason code, transaction reference, dates and status.
  • AurusPaytech and Aatman shall provide the required transaction, authorization, fulfilment/refund and customer-service evidence within the applicable scheme/acquirer timelines.
  • Where a refund has already been issued, the evidence shall clearly establish the refund date, amount and reference.
  • Where a chargeback is accepted or otherwise resolved in favour of the payer, the financial impact shall be reconciled and recorded.
  • Repeated disputes, suspected fraud or unusual refund patterns shall be escalated to Risk/Compliance for investigation.
  • Users may raise payment-related queries, disputes, or chargeback requests through the Help/Support option in the Aatman application. Payment transactions are processed through a designated third-party payment service provider, which is responsible for transaction processing, authorization, and related payment services. Disputes and chargebacks shall be handled in accordance with the applicable policies and procedures of the payment service provider, acquiring bank, and payment network. The service provider's applicable terms and conditions shall govern the payment dispute and chargeback process.

14. Reconciliation and Record Retention

Aatman and AurusPaytech shall maintain appropriate records of original transactions, refund requests, approvals, refund references, reversals, chargebacks, communications, settlement/reconciliation entries and exception handling.

Records shall be retained for the period prescribed by applicable law, RBI requirements, contractual obligations, payment-network rules and the organization's record-retention policy, whichever applicable requirement is longer.

15. Fraud, Abuse and Exceptions

Refunds may be placed on hold for investigation where there are reasonable indicators of fraud, account takeover, refund abuse, money laundering, sanctions concerns or other prohibited activity. Any such investigation shall be handled under the applicable fraud/risk/ AML procedure and shall not be used to circumvent mandatory regulatory timelines.

16. Customer Grievance and Escalation

Aatman shall provide a clearly accessible customer support/grievance channel for refund and cancellation requests. AurusPaytech shall provide the applicable operational escalation mechanism for payment-processing issues. Complaints shall be logged, assigned, tracked and closed within applicable regulatory and internal timelines. The applicable nodal/grievance officer details and escalation matrix shall be published where required.

17. Compliance and Regulatory Alignment

This policy shall be implemented with reference to applicable RBI directions governing Payment Aggregators, the RBI framework for failed transactions and customer compensation, applicable payment-network operating regulations, contractual requirements, consumer-protection requirements, PCI DSS/security requirements and other applicable laws and regulations, as amended from time to time.

Where a regulatory, statutory, payment-network or contractual requirement prescribes a stricter timeline or control than this policy, the stricter applicable requirement shall prevail.

18. Key Control Matrix

Area Aatman Control AurusPaytech Control Evidence
Refund approval Validate eligibility and approve Validate transaction/platform eligibility and process Request, approval, transaction/refund ID
Failed transaction Customer communication and case tracking Status monitoring, reversal/escalation Gateway status, reversal reference
Duplicate transaction Confirm order duplication Idempotency/duplicate detection Transaction/order IDs
Pending transaction Do not fulfil/refund solely on debit message Status polling/reconciliation Status logs
Partial refund Approve amount per terms Enforce cumulative refund limit Refund records
Chargeback Provide fulfilment/refund evidence Manage payment-channel workflow Representment/chargeback evidence
Reconciliation Reconcile order/refund records Reconcile gateway/acquirer/settlement Daily reconciliation reports

19. Exceptions

Any exception to this policy shall be documented with business justification, risk assessment, approval by the designated authority and an expiry/review date. Exceptions shall not override mandatory RBI, statutory or payment-network requirements.

Appendix A – Regulatory Reference Points

  • RBI – Master Direction on Regulation of Payment Aggregator (15 September 2025), including the Dispute Management Framework requiring mechanisms for payment disputes, refund timelines, reason codes, chargeback responses and clear allocation of responsibilities among PA, merchants, acquiring banks and other stakeholders.
  • RBI – DPSS.CO.PD No.629/02.01.014/2019-20 dated 20 September 2019, Harmonisation of Turn Around Time (TAT) and Customer Compensation for Failed Transactions using Authorised Payment Systems, as amended from time to time.
  • Applicable payment-card network rules, UPI operating rules, acquiring-bank procedures and other payment-system requirements, as applicable to the transaction type.